Key takeaways
Tranche thickness is moving from technical detail to strategic consideration.
As CLO regulation evolves, structure may matter more alongside ratings.
Insurers that prepare early may be better positioned to manage risk, capital, and manager oversight.
For life insurers, structured credit analysis has long relied on ratings, attachment points, manager quality, and relative value. That framework still matters, but it may no longer be enough. As the NAIC revisits life risk-based capital (RBC) treatment for collateralized loan obligation (CLO), tranche thickness is emerging as an important risk measure, particularly for certain lower-rated debt tranches. The reason is simple: Two securities with the same rating may not produce the same modeled risk or capital outcome.
At a high level, tranche thickness refers to how large a tranche is relative to the overall CLO capital structure. A thicker tranche spans a larger portion of the liability stack; a thinner tranche covers a smaller slice. That may sound like a structural detail, but it affects how quickly a tranche can absorb losses once stress moves through the deal. In general, thinner tranches have less room for error. If losses begin to reach that part of the structure, the tranche can move from appearing stable to experiencing sharp deterioration more quickly. This is one reason regulators and modelers increasingly view thickness as relevant to tail risk, particularly for lower-rated tranches where structural protection is already more limited. Recent NAIC discussions describe tranche thickness as a potentially useful comparable attribute for assigning CLO C-1 capital factors, especially for tranches rated Baa3 or below.
| Illustrative comparison | Baseline C-1: Simple average | Modeled C-1: Thick tranche (>4%) | Modeled C-1: Thin tranche (≤4%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | Baa3 | Baa3 | Baa3 |
| C-1 capital charge | 5.94% | 2.73% | 12.52% |
| Headline takeaway | Average capital treatment may mask structural differences across similarly rated tranches | Thicker tranche may retain lower modeled capital treatment | Thinner tranche may attract meaningfully higher modeled capital treatment |
| Why it matters | Useful baseline, but it does not distinguish between thicker and thinner tranches with the same rating | Same rating, but more structural cushion | Same rating, but less cushion and greater sensitivity in stress |
The illustrative comparison is directional, but it captures the central point. Under one of the approaches discussed in the current CLO RBC work, a Baa3 tranche that is thicker than the proposed cutoff could remain aligned with a lower factor, while a thinner Baa3 tranche could be treated much more conservatively. External summaries of the March 2026 regulator discussions indicate that the relevant breakpoint under consideration was 4% of the total deal for tranches rated Baa3 or below—reinforcing that structure, not just rating, may influence capital going forward.
The broader regulatory objective is to refine the RBC framework to better reflect the actual risk profile of increasingly complex investments held by life insurers. In the CLO context, recent NAIC meeting materials and the March 2026 presentation from the American Academy of Actuaries suggest a few key conclusions. First, ratings still carry substantial information and remain the starting point for comparability. Second, senior tranches appear to have relatively low modeled risk, while risk rises sharply further down the capital structure. Third, for some lowerrated tranches, tranche thickness appears to add explanatory power because it helps identify where tail risk may be more concentrated. That is why a concept long understood by structured credit specialists is now becoming relevant to a wider insurance audience, including investment teams, risk leaders, and finance executives.
For life insurers, the takeaway is not that ratings no longer matter, it’s that ratings may not tell the full story in every part of a structured credit allocation. If tranche thickness becomes embedded in the RBC framework for certain CLO exposures, portfolio analysis may need to become more granular. That could affect how insurers compare apparently similar bonds, evaluate manager positioning in mezzanine risk, think about capital efficiency, and assess whether spread compensation is sufficient for the structural risk being assumed. It could also influence how insurers engage external managers and surveillance providers. A manager that emphasizes high-quality structured credit may still deliver very different capital outcomes depending on where, and how thinly, it invests within a transaction. In that environment, asking only for ratings distribution may be incomplete; insurers may also want reporting that shows structural positioning, tranche sizing, and concentration in areas where regulatory treatment could tighten.
In practical terms, insurers do not need to wait for final rules to begin preparing. A sensible first step is to identify where existing structured credit exposure may be sensitive to tranche-level structural features, particularly in lower-rated CLO holdings. The goal is not to overreact to a proposal still in development, but to ensure that portfolio construction, manager oversight, and capital planning are informed by the structural details that may matter more going forward.
Tranche thickness has traditionally been the kind of detail discussed by structurers, managers, and specialist analysts. That is changing. As the NAIC continues to evaluate CLO RBC methodology, life insurers should be prepared for a framework that may look beyond ratings alone in selected parts of the capital structure. Even if final rules evolve from the current proposals, the policy direction is clear: Regulators are seeking a more risk-sensitive treatment of structured credit, and structural features may matter more than they have in the past. For insurers active in CLOs and other structured sectors, now is a good time to review portfolio exposures, manager reporting, and internal frameworks to ensure that tranche thickness and similar structural considerations are on the radar before regulatory changes are finalized.
Sources:
- American Academy of Actuaries, C-1 Subcommittee Update on CLO C-1 Factors Modeling, presentation to the NAIC Risk-Based Capital Investment Risk and Evaluation (E) Working Group, March 2, 2026.
- NAIC, Risk-Based Capital Investment Risk and Evaluation (E) Working Group Summary, Spring National Meeting, March 2026.
- NAIC exposed proposal materials on CLO modified RBC structure and tranche thickness, 2026.
- AIC proposal materials related to CLO factor treatment, 2026.
Risk considerations
Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Past Performance does not guarantee future return. All financial investments involve an element of risk. Therefore, the value of the investment and the income from it will vary and the initial investment amount cannot be guaranteed. Fixed income investment options are subject to interest rate risk, and their value will decline as interest rates rise. Potential investors should be aware that Investment grade corporate bonds carry credit risks, default risk, liquidity risks, currency risks, operational risks, legal risks, counterparty risk and valuation risks. Fixed-income options that invest in mortgage securities are subject to increased risk due to real estate exposure.
Important information
This material covers general information only and does not take account of any investor’s investment objectives or financial situation and should not be construed as specific investment advice, a recommendation, or be relied on in any way as a guarantee, promise, forecast or prediction of future events regarding an investment or the markets in general. Information presented has been derived from sources believed to be accurate; however, we do not independently verify or guarantee its accuracy or validity. Any reference to a specific investment or security does not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold such investment or security, nor an indication that the investment manager or its affiliates has recommended a specific security for any client account. Subject to any contrary provisions of applicable law, the investment manager and its affiliates, and their officers, directors, employees, agents, disclaim any express or implied warranty of reliability or accuracy and any responsibility arising in any way (including by reason of negligence) for errors or omissions in the information or data provided.
This material may contain `forward-looking’ information that is not purely historical in nature and may include, among other things, projections, and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader.
All figures shown in this document are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.
Index performance information reflects no deduction for fees, expenses, or taxes. Indices are unmanaged and individuals cannot invest directly in an index.
This document is intended for use in:
- The United States by Principal Global Investors, LLC, which is regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
- Europe by Principal Global Investors (Ireland) Limited, 70 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Dublin 2, D02 R296, Ireland. Principal Global Investors (Ireland) Limited is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. Clients that do not directly contract with Principal Global Investors (Europe) Limited (“PGIE”) or Principal Global Investors (Ireland) Limited (“PGII”) will not benefit from the protections offered by the rules and regulations of the Financial Conduct Authority or the Central Bank of Ireland, including those enacted under MiFID II. Further, where clients do contract with PGIE or PGII, PGIE or PGII may delegate management authority to affiliates that are not authorised and regulated within Europe and in any such case, the client may not benefit from all protections offered by the rules and regulations of the Financial Conduct Authority, or the Central Bank of Ireland. In Europe, this document is directed exclusively at Professional Clients and Eligible Counterparties and should not be relied upon by Retail Clients (all as defined by the MiFID).
- United Kingdom by Principal Global Investors (Europe) Limited, Level 1, 1 Wood Street, London, EC2V 7 JB, registered in England, No. 03819986, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”).
- This document is marketing material and is issued in Switzerland by Principal Global Investors (Switzerland) GmbH.
- United Arab Emirates by Principal Investor Management (DIFC) Limited, an entity registered in the Dubai International Financial Centre and authorized by the Dubai Financial Services Authority as an Authorised Firm, in its capacity as distributor / promoter of the products and services of Principal Asset Management. This document is delivered on an individual basis to the recipient and should not be passed on or otherwise distributed by the recipient to any other person or organisation.
- Singapore by Principal Global Investors (Singapore)Limited (ACRA Reg.No.199603735H), which is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore and is directed exclusively at institutional investors as defined by the Securities and Futures Act 2001. This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
- Australia by Principal Global Investors (Australia) Limited (ABN 45 102 488 068, AFS License No. 225385), which is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and is only directed at wholesale clients as defined under Corporations Act 2001.
- Hong Kong SAR by Principal Asset Management Company (Asia) Limited, which is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission. This document has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission. This document may only be distributed, circulated or issued to persons who are Professional Investors under the Securities and Futures Ordinance and any rules made under that Ordinance or as otherwise permitted by that Ordinance.
- Other APAC Countries/Jurisdictions. This material is issued for Institutional Investors only (or professional/sophisticated/qualified investors, as such term may apply in local jurisdictions) and is delivered on an individual basis to the recipient and should not be passed on, used by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
Principal Global Investors, LLC (PGI) is registered with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a commodity trading advisor (CTA), a commodity pool operator (CPO) and is a member of the National Futures Association (NFA). PGI advises qualified eligible persons (QEPs) under CFTC Regulation 4.7.
Principal Asset Management℠ is a trade name of Principal Global Investors, LLC. Principal Global Investors® leads global asset management, a member of the Principal Financial Group®, Des Moines, IA 50392.
Insurance solutions are provided by Investment Solutions, an advisory team within Principal Asset Management℠.
© 2026 Principal Financial Services, Inc. Principal®, Principal Financial Group®, Principal Asset Management, and Principal and the logomark design are registered trademarks and service marks of Principal Financial Services, Inc., a Principal Financial Group company, in various countries around the world and may be used only with the permission of Principal Financial Services, Inc.
MM15019 | 06/2026 | 5558629-062027