Real estate’s environmental impact is significant. In the European Union, buildings are responsible for 40% of overall energy consumption and 36% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, much of which is generated from the construction and operation of properties.1

At the same time, three out of four EU buildings are considered energy inefficient.1

Core real estate investors have demonstrated a desire to change these dynamics and continue to make environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors a top priority.

Achieving carbon neutrality has been a particularly high priority, as organisations are increasingly committing to reducing their carbon footprint. This goal has already altered the landscape and will only become a higher priority for more businesses, governments, and investors. The number of real estate companies and investment funds focused on carbon neutrality continues to increase at a rapid pace, accelerated by the European Commission’s adoption of regulations last year aimed at achieving net zero carbon by 2050.2

But not all approaches to carbon neutrality are equal. Business leaders are often quick to agree to long-term carbon reduction goals without a full understanding of implementation at the individual property level.

To understand exactly how a company or fund plans to meet their stated carbon reduction goals, investors should be prepared to ask several important questions when evaluating intiatives and measuring results.

Definitions matter

One of the biggest obstacles to understanding a carbon reduction programme’s impact is a lack of a uniform definition and consistent approach to carbon neutrality. The path by which funds achieve carbon neutrality can vary greatly depending on what activities are pursued, such as emissions reduction via operational improvements versus purchasing environmental attribute certificates (EACs) and carbon offsets.

While the term “carbon neutrality” can be loosely applied to a wide array of practices, it’s essentially a commitment to balancing GHG emissions through a combination of emissions-reductions activities and the purchase of EACs and carbon offsets.

There are, however, many more considerations to take into account when trying to understand how a firm or fund is moving toward this goal. You’ll find them below.

Carbon neutrality: Five key questions for core fund due diligence:
  1. What emission sources are included?
  2. How is the fund’s carbon footprint measured?
  3. What types of emissions reductions count toward a target?
  4. Are tenants actively engaged and included in the target?
  5. What processes are in place to identify energy efficiency and renewable energy? Opportunities?

Emission criteria: What’s included?

Often, sustainability reports will include carbon neutral claims front and center—but with scant details around how exactly carbon neutrality will be achieved.

An investor should also understand which emissions are included to accurately assess the quality of a carbon neutrality goal.

There are two main categories of emissions: direct and indirect (See Exhibit 1). Direct GHG emissions (Scope 1) are from company-owned sources, such as heating fuel, gas in company vehicles, or leakage from refrigerants. Indirect GHG emissions (Scopes 2 and 3) can come from the consumption of purchased electricity or a company’s activities outside of its control, such as employee travel or tenant emissions.

Understanding which of these emissions are counted can be critical to understanding a company’s true carbon footprint and reduction goals.

For example, a real estate portfolio that excludes tenant energy consumption from its footprint could easily overlook the vast majority of emissions occurring within its properties.

In addition, a business could theoretically measure its emissions and then buy carbon offsets the next day and claim to be carbon neutral without verifying the quality of the offsets or making any attempts to reduce operational emissions.

While technically the business would be carbon neutral—because they are balancing emissions with offsets—this is not nearly as impactful, or defensible to investors, as taking steps to increase energy performance through operational improvements. Therefore, a savvy investor should care not just about which emissions are included in the footprint, but also the source of emissions reductions and how it changes over time.

Exhibit 1: Overview of a company's activities associated emissions, and their scopes, as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard

Infographic overview of a company's activities associated emissions, and their scopes, as defined by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard.

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, March 2004

The importance of tenant engagement

On average, the total emission from a property comes mostly from tenant activities. In some instances, such as with warehouses, nearly 100% of emissions are from the tenant.

But a large number of emissions reduction claims from property owners don’t account for tenant spaces by only counting certain tenant emissions or not counting these emissions at all.

While this might have been acceptable in the past, stakeholders now expect tenant activities to be captured. Some would argue that if a property owner isn’t trying to influence tenant emissions, then they are likely not carrying out an effective carbon reduction programme at all.

For any successful carbon reduction strategy, tenants must work openly and in-line with owners for targets to be met.

Engaging tenants early on—whether through a detailed survey on carbon neutrality issues or an assessment to determine what ESG considerations are most important to the tenant—will help ensure an ongoing partnership to meet stated goals for the business and tenant. Ultimately, this type of engagement helps investors and other stakeholders have a better understanding of a property’s carbon footprint.

Asset-level data is key

When evaluating the carbon reduction programme for a company or fund, data availability is critical. Identifying data gaps, making estimates where possible, and having a plan to improve coverage over time are all important evaluation tools.

It’s one thing to make a broad carbon neutrality claim, but it’s another thing entirely to back up that claim with a complete data set.

Access to tenant utility data can be particularly challenging, especially in a triple net lease arrangement where the tenant is paying their own bills. However, getting access to high-quality property-level data—whether through tenant outreach, metering solutions, or working directly with utilities—is necessary to prioritise improvements and track progress.

A complete data set of whole-building energy data also allows businesses to more accurately measure their GHG emissions, set and achieve meaningful carbon reduction targets, and monitor progress over time.

Many core funds in this space have little access to this type of data, even as it is a key foundational element to any successful carbon reduction programme. Investors should be wary of any fund or business without access to a robust and accurate data set.

Exhibit 2: Principal Real Estate- A history of responsible property investing

Infographic of the history of responsible property investing for Principal Real Estate.

Effective programmes are a win for all stakeholders

ESG policies and initiatives, including the implementation of carbon neutrality proposals, will continue to be a top priority for investors, occupiers, and landlords. We believe the transition to a lower carbon economy begins at the individual property level and that prioritising high-impact operational emissions reductions will help create measurable change.

In addition to improving environmental performance, core funds that implement effective carbon neutrality programmes can reduce operating costs, ultimately benefiting investors. Moreover, a rapidly changing regulatory landscape, driven by the exploration of new topics such as embodied carbon, will continue to impact carbon footprints.

As this landscape evolves, we as a firm remain focused on our own sustainable business practices. These include assessing our impact to the climate and adopting responsible investing policies, as stated in our Pillars of Responsible Property Investing (PRPI) initiative.

Effective carbon reduction programmes will improve the performance and value of properties and ultimately help redefine the relationship between real estate and carbon. We believe that funds with a well-defined programme focused on true propertylevel emissions reduction will emerge as the beneficiaries in this environment.

3 Performance band score of “A+” by earning 50 out of 51 maximum points in the PRI 2020 assessment. For further details, please refer to the PRI Assessment Methodology, Principal Global Investors full Assessment Report and Transparency Report, all of which is available upon request.
4 2021 Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) assessment, data as of 31 December 2020. Rating represents top 40% worldwide performance.
5 2020 CDP Climate Change Response, data as of 31 December 2019.
6 Each year, the EPA honors organizations that have made outstanding contributions to protecting the environment through energy efficiency. April 2022, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Third party rankings and recognitions are no guarantee of future investment success and do not ensure that a client or prospective client will experience a higher level of performance or results.
7 Presented by the Institute for Market Transformation (IMT) and the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Better Buildings Alliance, the Green Lease Leaders designation exhibits a strong commitment to increased performance and sustainability in buildings, 8 June 2020.


Risk Warnings
Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Potential investors should be aware of the risks inherent to owning and investing in real estate, including: value fluctuations, capital market pricing volatility, liquidity risks, leverage, credit risk, occupancy risk and legal risk. All these risks can lead to a decline in the value of the real estate, a decline in the income produced by the real estate and declines in the value or total loss in value of securities derived from investments in real estate.

Important Information
Unless otherwise noted, the information in this document has been derived from sources believed to be accurate as of June 2022. Information derived from sources other than Principal Global Investors or its affiliates is believed to be reliable; however, we do not independently verify or guarantee its accuracy or validity. This material contains general information only and does not take account of any investor’s investment objectives or financial situation and should not be construed as specific investment advice, recommendation or be relied on in any way as a guarantee, promise, forecast or prediction of future events regarding an investment or the markets in general. The opinions and predictions expressed are subject to change without prior notice. Any reference to a specific investment or security does not constitute a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold such investment or security, nor an indication that Principal Global Investors or its affiliates has recommended a specific security for any client account.

Subject to any contrary provisions of applicable law, Principal Global Investors and its affiliates, and their officers, directors, employees, agents, disclaim any express or implied warranty of reliability or accuracy and any responsibility arising in any way (including by reason of negligence) for errors or omissions in this document or in the information or data provided in this document.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results and should not be relied upon to make an investment decision. All figures shown in this document are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal.

This material may contain ‘forward looking’ information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader.

This document is issued in:

  • The United States by Principal Global Investors, LLC, which is regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • Europe by Principal Global Investors (EU) Limited, Sobo Works, Windmill Lane, Dublin D02 K156, Ireland. Principal Global Investors (EU) Limited is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. In Europe, this document is directed exclusively at Professional Clients and Eligible Counterparties and should not be relied upon by Retail Clients (all as defined by the MiFID). The contents of the document have been approved by the relevant entity. Clients that do not directly contract with Principal Global Investors (Europe) Limited (“PGIE”) or Principal Global Investors (EU) Limited (“PGI EU”) will not benefit from the protections offered by the rules and regulations of the Financial Conduct Authority or the Central Bank of Ireland, including those enacted under MiFID II. Further, where clients do contract with PGIE or PGI EU, PGIE or PGI EU may delegate management authority to affiliates that are not authorized and regulated within Europe and in any such case, the client may not benefit from all protections offered by the rules and regulations of the Financial Conduct Authority, or the Central Bank of Ireland.
  • United Kingdom by Principal Global Investors (Europe) Limited, Level 1, 1 Wood Street, London, EC2V 7 JB, registered in England, No. 03819986, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”).
  • United Arab Emirates by Principal Global Investors LLC, a branch registered in the Dubai International Financial Centre and authorized by the Dubai Financial Services Authority as a representative office and is delivered on an individual basis to the recipient and should not be passed on or otherwise distributed by the recipient to any other person or organisation.
  • Singapore by Principal Global Investors (Singapore)Limited (ACRA Reg. No. 199603735H), which is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore and is directed exclusively at institutional investors as defined by the Securities and Futures Act 2001. This advertisement or publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
  • Australia by Principal Global Investors (Australia) Limited (ABN 45 102 488 068, AFS Licence No. 225385), which is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. This document is intended for sophisticated institutional investors only.
  • This document is marketing material and is issued in Switzerland by Principal Global Investors (Switzerland) GmbH.
  • Hong Kong SAR (China) by Principal Global Investors (Hong Kong) Limited, which is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission and is directed exclusively at professional investors as defined by the Securities and Futures Ordinance.
  • Other APAC Countries, this material is issued for institutional investors only(or professional/sophisticated/qualified investors, as such term may apply in local jurisdictions) and is delivered on an individual basis to the recipient and should not be passed on, used by any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation. Principal Funds, Inc. are distributed by Principal Funds Distributor, Inc.

© 2022 Principal Financial Services, Inc. Principal®, Principal Financial Group®, and Principal and the logomark design are registered trademarks of Principal Financial Services, Inc., a Principal Financial Group company, in the United States and are trademarks and services marks of Principal Financial Services, Inc., in various countries around the world. Principal Global Investors leads global asset management at Principal®. Principal Real Estate Investors is a dedicated real estate investment management group within Principal Global Investors.

MM12358-07 | 06/2022 | 2244528 | 122023

About the author