The 2026 Mid-Year Outlook: Resilient Recovery made the case that the CRE recovery remains intact.
- Private valuations continue to rise, debt capital is readily available, and transaction volumes accelerated in 1Q26.
- Sentiment indicators suggest investors are more deliberate in their decision-making but haven’t lost conviction.
- U.S. listed REITs, a leading indicator, have transitioned from recovery into expansion, while distress, a lagging indicator, is showing early signs of peaking.
But there’s more to the story than the headline suggests. The NCREIF Property Index (NPI), which measures unlevered total returns for U.S. CRE, posted a relatively modest year-over-year total return of +4.9% in 1Q26. While this may suggest a U-shaped recovery, the pattern is more accurately characterized as K-shaped, given significant dispersion across property types and markets.
In 1Q26, there was a +144 basis point spread between the top (+2.2%) and bottom (+0.7%) quartiles of total returns across the 451 property subtypes and CBSA combinations in the NPI. At the extremes, strip retail in the Nashville CBSA produced the highest quarterly total return at +10.3%, while CBD office in the San Diego CBSA produced the lowest at -13.5%.
To be clear, dispersion in returns has always existed and always will. The challenge is that rising valuations tend to mask it; even relative underperformers produce positive returns, so the market doesn't pay much attention. For example, during the post-GFC recovery (1Q10–1Q12), even the bottom quartile generated average quarterly returns of +1.4%, or +5.6% annualized. During the expansions from 3Q95–2Q08 and 2Q12–3Q22, the bottom quartile still produced returns of +1.6% (+6.4% annualized) and +1.1% (+4.4% annualized), respectively.
However, today’s environment looks materially different. The last time the market experienced dispersion like today was nearly 30 years ago, following the S&L crisis. During that recovery (1Q93–2Q95), the bottom quartile generated average quarterly returns of +0.7% (+2.8% annualized), compared to +0.5% (+2.0% annualized) in the current recovery from 3Q24–1Q26. This environment, therefore, feels like a shock to the system: it is neither a V-shaped recovery (post-GFC), a broad-based expansion, nor a uniform downturn.
In other words, for the first time in a long time, investors are confronted with the challenge of generating alpha through disciplined property and market selection, complemented by a healthy focus on operational efficiency. Dispersion in returns is likely to become an even greater theme this cycle, as limited cap rate compression makes NOI growth the primary driver of total returns.
The most compelling alpha opportunities ahead may be in the property types and markets generating the highest annualized rent growth. Conversely, the mundane performance of the bottom quartile may feel more punishing this cycle, and far more akin to the early 1990s.
Bottom line
The CRE recovery remains intact, but the headline obscures an increasingly uneven landscape. A +144 basis point spread between the top and bottom quartiles of NPI returns in 1Q26 underscores the extent of this divergence. With cap rate compression unlikely to bail out underperformers, NOI growth is likely to be the return engine this cycle. For the first time in 30 years, alpha will be earned, not given, through disciplined property and market selection paired with operational execution.
Investing involves risk, including possible loss of Principal. Past Performance does not guarantee future return. Potential investors should be aware of the risks inherent to owning and investing in real estate, including value fluctuations, capital market pricing volatility, liquidity risks, leverage, credit risk, occupancy risk and legal risk. All these risks can lead to a decline in the value of the real estate, a decline in the income produced by the real estate and declines in the value or total loss in value of securities derived from investments in real estate. Commercial real estate (CRE) investments carry several inherent risks, including those related to the economy, interest rates, and tenant behavior. These risks can impact property values, rental income, and overall investment returns.
Views and opinions expressed are accurate as of the date of this communication and are subject to change without notice. This material may contain ‘forward-looking’ information that is not purely historical in nature and may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader.
The information in the article should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation for the purchase or sale of any security. The general information it contains does not take account of any investor’s investment objectives, particular needs, or financial situation.
5588886
No information