Home Insights Macro views July FOMC meeting: Ruling nothing out
Aerial view of a shipping yard at sunset.

July FOMC meeting: Ruling nothing out

Market response

July 30, 2025 | 3 min read
Seema Shah
Managing Director, Chief Strategist
linkedin icon link icon

At its July meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decided to keep its benchmark policy rate unchanged at 4.25%-4.50% as expected. However, this was not a unanimous decision. For the first time since 1993, there were two dissents, with Fed Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman voting to cut policy rates by 25 basis points.

Even so, the press conference provided no clear policy direction. Chair Powell did not offer any clues or guidance around the September FOMC meeting, although his broader comments leaned marginally more hawkish than the market had anticipated. With two employment reports and two inflation prints to be released ahead of the next meeting, the outlook for Fed cuts remains wide open.

Current policy backdrop

As well as contending with White House criticism of Chair Powell and the decision to keep policy rates on hold over recent months, the Fed has also had to confront an uncertain trade policy backdrop and conflicting economic signals.

Survey data continue to suggest consumer weakness, while economic activity data remained broadly robust. In the labor market, hirings are low but so too are firings, while declining labor supply because of tighter immigration policy is likely to make employment data increasingly difficult to decipher in the coming months. Inflation has been trending lower, but is beginning to show signs of tariff pass-through to core goods prices. Against this backdrop, policy decisions are even less straightforward than usual, and so it is unsurprising that there are conflicting views within the committee.

Press conference—key observations

Chair Powell delivered several important insights about how the Fed is currently viewing the economic backdrop.

Tariff pass-through to inflation: Powell noted that, while it is still early days, tariffs are expected to be passed through to consumers. The Fed’s base case is that the tariff-induced boost to inflation will likely prove short lived, reflecting a one-time shift in the price level— but, with so many uncertainties still left to be resolved, it is appropriate to guard against inflation risk.

Tariff uncertainty: Recent news flow has cleared up some of the tariff questions, but tariff discussions likely still have much further to go—so tariff uncertainty remains elevated.

Labor market supply dynamics: Powell described the labor market as robust and that the full employment target is currently being met. He acknowledged that labor demand is cooling and that there are downside risks but, as labor supply has also decreased due to declining immigration flows, the labor market is in balance.

Current policy stance: The Fed funds rate is sitting at “modestly restrictive” levels. Powell noted that of their two targets in their dual mandate, inflation is further away from goal than the labor market is. If the two goals move closer into balance, then policy should move to a more neutral setting.

Policy outlook

Chair Powell gave away very little during today’s press conference. This shouldn’t be a surprise—there is currently too much uncertainty for the Fed to signal a clear policy direction for September.

However, FOMC Governor Waller has more conviction than Powell (and us) about the outlook and has adopted a very dovish tone. His concern that labor market demand is cooling rapidly is gaining traction, both within the committee (as reflected in the dissent from Governor Bowman) and among analysts. It is not inconceivable that he will gain more support over the coming weeks, particularly if the upcoming jobs and inflation reports are weak, suggesting that the odds of a September rate cut are fair.

Our own view has been that the robustness of the economy, alongside expectations for a tariff-induced boost to inflation, not to mention persistent government policy uncertainty, mean that the Fed should remain on hold until later this year. But, with the drumbeat apparently growing louder within the Fed, an earlier rate cut is a clear possibility.
Macro views
Disclosure

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Views and opinions expressed are accurate as of the date of this communication and are subject to change without notice. This material may contain ‘forward-looking’ information that is not purely historical in nature and may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader.

The information in the article should not be construed as investment advice or a recommendation for the purchase or sale of any security. The general information it contains does not take account of any investor’s investment objectives, particular needs, or financial situation.

Insurance products and plan administrative services provided through Principal Life Insurance Co. Principal Funds, Inc. is distributed by Principal Funds Distributor, Inc. Securities are offered through Principal Securities, Inc., 800‐547‐7754, Member SIPC and/or independent broker/dealers. Principal Life, Principal Funds Distributor, Inc., and Principal Securities are members of the Principal Financial Group®, Des Moines, IA 50392.

4710514
About the author
Managing Director, Chief Strategist
Seema Shah

Seema is Managing Director - Chief Global Strategist at Principal Asset Management. Based in London, she oversees global market strategy, providing valuable insight and perspective on the global economy and markets to institutional and retail clients around the world. She is responsible for the creation of global economic macro and secular event research, in particular, global central bank policy and its impact on capital markets. Seema is a regular speaker at industry conferences and forums. She appears regularly on CNBC and Bloomberg TV and is frequently quoted by the financial news media. She has a weekly column in the UK’s Sunday Times newspaper, discussing economic, market and political issues.

Seema joined the firm in 2010, previously working as a strategist within Principal Fixed Income. Prior to joining Principal, Seema served as an economist at Capital Economics where she focused on macroeconomic analysis of the UK and the European economies. She also worked with the macro consulting group at PricewaterhouseCoopers, and as an economist at HM Treasury & Inland Revenue Service.

Seema received a master's degree and bachelor's degree with honors in economics from the London School of Economics.